The Tree of Life (2011)

Soul searching for beauty in a dull world.

Presentation:

Terrence Malick gives us his existential masterpiece. The film is realistically presented with Lubezkiโ€™s raw handheld camera work. Something about handheld feels so much more realistic. Most people will film arguments on closeups and tripods, but Malick presents it with dynamic ultrawides, allowing both debaters to be relevant simultaneously. I'd argue it's even more immersive. Handheld is so just so powerfully utilized in this film. Close-ups feel intimate and ultrawide angles are breathtaking. Pitt's character is understandable and nuanced while Chastain provides a consoling voice. Mood-wise absolutely striking and perhaps even one of the most beautifully shot films, but is that enough?

Conclusion:

Malick's work is often hit or miss. This is probably his most profound piece, though I think he has been surpassed by films like You Won't Be Alone, which may not have as much visual intrigue but capture the essence of what this film attempts to get at. It's a truly beautiful piece that should speak to anyone with a less than perfect household. But for those that do a little less soul searching, this might just be a bore. In some ways I think the visuals in this film are unmatched, but without a stronger story itโ€™s feels a bit documentary in an empty way. Unfortunately, this film won't convert such audiences and is meant to nourish an already existential mind. Although itโ€™s an experience that sticks with you and probably good for the soul, thereโ€™s not much concrete substance. But I guess thatโ€™s the point. Oh, how Malick can create a film that is genuinely good and bad simultaneously. Suburban life is dull, but this experience isnโ€™t.


more film spice

Recommendations

Previous
Previous

House of Flying Daggers (2004)

Next
Next

Dogtooth (2009)