It's hard to say why this love letter was made.
Presentation:
The film follows honest businessman Oscar Isaac and Jessica Chastain in 1981 NYC hardships. Vintage warm aesthetics bring us back in time, but the pacing might leave you wanting to go back sooner than you'd expect. The film is quite slow despite strong performances.
Conclusion:
Although I personally found some great moments of acting, I don't think this is a very good film, leaving you asking, "why bother, why care?" There's no inspiration or purpose to this love story, which feels observatory and neutral. A snap shot of the past, yet no caption. At best this is a slow burn. At worst, you'll fall asleep.
Recommendations
Not the smashing you expected.
One giant leap for moviegoers.
Brilliance comes at a cost.
Draw me like one of your French girls.
Sins of the fรผhrer.
What is Jerusalem worth?
One does not simply get revenge on Billy the Butcher.
Thereโs still plenty of magic left in the tank for holiday cinema.
Being positive is the most heroic thing we can do.
Why the 60s and 70s were peak cinema.
Fight, flight or love?
Porno has never been more cinematic!
Closing the chapter to Clint Eastwoodโs westerns.
The archetypal western.
The last truly epic historical biography.
Recounting the flaws of human bias.
Style over substance.
Bringing wonder back to cinema.
The best looking black and white film?
Seasick of streaming platform slop.
Not enough to hate, not enough to love.
War never changes.
Musicals can indeed be cinematic.
Canโt control the bull in or out of the ring.
How does a RBMK reactor explode?
Film architecture also needs to be concrete.
Painting a Russian bible epic.
Bob Dylan and mainstream are like electric and folk.
Samurai epic meets spaghetti western.
Is it better to suffer injustice than do it?