Gangs of New York (2002)

One does not simply get revenge on Billy the Butcher.

Presentation:

Martin Scorsese createsโ€ฆwait for itโ€ฆanother gangster film! But itโ€™s not like his other ones. This one feels different, more similar to Killers of the Flower Moon. Itโ€™s incredibly ambitious and perhaps might be one of the best looking costume films of the time. The era is depicted down to a tee with a beautiful filmic grade completely immersing us in the periods of abolition. The film starts out as a character focused film then transitions to political intrigue and then lots of typical bloody gangster action. One thing is for certain, Daniel Day Lewis is incredible as always, though everyoneโ€™s accent needs work. I think the only good Irish accent was John C. Reillyโ€™s, but to be honest itโ€™s one of the more difficult accents to understand so maybe itโ€™s a good thing they toned it down so we could understand the plot. The problem is the film doesnโ€™t really make us care about DiCaprioโ€™s character nor the historical events. They sort of just assume we know and care about these two gangsโ€™ beef. The pacing is also very lopsided toward the end with unfocused editing. It feels rushed and over-edited from the abrupt transitions despite still having a long run time. The rough edits for action sequences are comical, combined with early CGI makes it hard to watch in 2025.

Conclusion:

In this film things just happen then we move on without a reaction. This makes it feel more like a historical retelling, but then why focus so much on character development at the beginning only to turn into The History Channel toward the end? I still donโ€™t care about Billy the Butcher, even despite a fantastically motivated Daniel Day Lewis. But hey, at least it looks good and admittedly different than the other gangster films. One thing is for certain, top hat gangsters are pretty dapper.


more film spice

Recommendations

Previous
Previous

Being John Malkovich (1999)

Next
Next

12 Monkeys (1995)