Girl with a Pearl Earring (2003)
Can a painting be famous enough for an entire movie?
Presentation:
The story follows artist Johannes Vermeer in the 1600s and how he created one of his most famous works. Itโs a very well known painting that most have seen, but this is not a true story with superficial drama and gossip. Itโs a lovely period piece, slow yet simple, captured through beautiful walks in the park.
Conclusion:
I think one of the most disappointing aspects of this film is that Scarlett Johansson doesnโt capture the essence of the painting. She feels reserved, restrained, uncomfortable, defiant, though these arenโt the attributes of the real girl in the painting. A small detail, but in my opinion a crucial one in order to suspend disbelief. Sometimes expressions set an entire tone for a film, and Johansson doesnโt deliver such a performance when the entire film rests on her portrayal.
Recommendations
Not the smashing you expected.
One giant leap for moviegoers.
Brilliance comes at a cost.
Draw me like one of your French girls.
Sins of the fรผhrer.
What is Jerusalem worth?
One does not simply get revenge on Billy the Butcher.
Thereโs still plenty of magic left in the tank for holiday cinema.
Being positive is the most heroic thing we can do.
Why the 60s and 70s were peak cinema.
Fight, flight or love?
Porno has never been more cinematic!
Closing the chapter to Clint Eastwoodโs westerns.
The archetypal western.
The last truly epic historical biography.
Recounting the flaws of human bias.
Style over substance.
Bringing wonder back to cinema.
The best looking black and white film?
MacOS Samsara, the screensaver.
Seasick of streaming platform slop.
Put the brush down, Wes Anderson.
Not enough to hate, not enough to love.
War never changes.
Musicals can indeed be cinematic.
Canโt control the bull in or out of the ring.
How does a RBMK reactor explode?
Film architecture also needs to be concrete.
Painting a Russian bible epic.
Is it better to suffer injustice than do it?