Perhaps the best musicals are the saddest ones.

Presentation:

This may be the only musical Iโ€™ve enjoyed, largely because it is nothing like a conventional musical. There are about 5 musical numbers from Icelandic artist Bjรถrk, whom composed and acted in her first film. Famously having residual mental trauma from the film, once you watch you will understand why. Bjรถrkโ€™s performance is inspired, realistic, and you would never think she hadnโ€™t acted before. Most importantly, her music is very interesting to listen to unlike typical jazz hand musicals. This is more like atmospheric electronic trip-hop, and I loved it. Whatโ€™s genuinely shocking is why everything works. Trierโ€™s signature handheld style creates a realism, which contrasts with the surreal interjecting musical numbers. This doesnโ€™t seem like it would make sense, but since Trier filmโ€™s are always so dark and gritty, the musical interludes become a very welcome respite from the bleak misery of the story. This is an emotionally triggering film more-so than Breaking the Waves, despite not being as depraved.

Conclusion:

Thereโ€™s a lot of cinema Trier explores in this semi-experimental film. Out of all directors, no one would expect Trier to make a musical, and perhaps thatโ€™s why it works. If you're like me and donโ€™t like musicals, give this a shot up to the second musical number. If it doesnโ€™t convince you by then the rest of the film probably wonโ€™t. The plot and competence of the characters may not be rock solid, but this format actually doesnโ€™t require typical filmmaking logic. Trier manages to bring out the rawest performances from all his female leads, and this may be one of the greatest. Just brace your heart.


Recommendations

Previous
Previous

Antichrist (2009)

Next
Next

A City of Sadness (1989)