Uncohesive story almost saved by beautiful cinematography from Roger Deakins.
Presentation:
Sometimes less is more as Deakins illustrates how simplicity allows performances to shine more. His work here is not the most impressive, but still noticeably invisible. The problem is the original novel is difficult to adapt as the story ends up feeling all over the place with jarring pacing.
Analysis:
The edits don't retain emotional continuity, which deprive the first half of character development and emotional investment. The long winded character building is prioritized which should make us care about the later half, but it ends up being so rushed that everything falls apart. The film tries to be emotionally charged, but fails in making us care one way of the other. The later arcs of the film feel borderline random and tonally inconsistent from what the first half of the film would suggest. Is this a crime film or drama? Most important, the film never addresses why the Goldfinch painting is emotionally important to the main protagonist.
Conclusion:
This film falls apart and is pretty much a bad film that although had its moments, is too ambitious to do justice to the many arcs of the lead character's longitudinal life. Perhaps Fincher would have been better suited to take this script on, as I don't agree that the core tone of this film should be a drama.
Recommendations
The Coen Brothersโ seriously unique sense of irony.
Riveting story of people going to any length to save a kidnapped daughter.
A stoner movie for intellectuals?
There is no other Mexican border.
Do androids dream of electric sheep?
How a coin toss changed cinema.
An overly long film befitting of its title.
Roger Deakins and Sam Mendes make a gorgeous piece that falls a bit short.
Itโs not easy to innovate modern westerns.
Shakespearean level comedy, ay?
A visually impressive war film shot in one take.
The only time youโll want to go to prison.